members to testify.
Because the two businesses had notice of and an opportunity to be heard during the city council meeting when their applications for individual special use exceptions were considered and denied, any statutory notice issues were waived under Code.2-2204 and their procedural due process rights.Windstar Properties 02/27/2009 In mechanic's lien proceedings, inclusion of charges in the memoranda of lien for materials supplied outside the 150-day limitation period prescribed by in Code 43-4 rendered the mechanic's liens invalid and unenforceable.The matter is also remanded for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and entry of final judgment.The trial court's judgment is reversed and the case is remanded 951427 Tomlin.Upon review of the facts of this case, the appellant has shown good cause to extend the period for filing transcripts.The decree rescinding the lease amendment is reversed and final judgment is entered in favor of the lessee.The judgment is reversed and final judgment entered for the insurer.The judgment of the trial court is reversed and final judgment entered for the former partner.Because the search was permissible under the Fourth Amendment, the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine does not require exclusion of his accompanying statement.C The trial court correctly concluded that Code 36-96.6(C as amended in 1991, can be applied to single family restrictive covenants recorded in 1975 and that judgment is affirmed.970050 Po River Water and Sewer.
83 (1963) are rejected as being without merit, his various claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are rejected as not satisfying the two-pronged test enunciated in Strickland.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
000069 Norfolk Southern.
Because the municipal corporation's arguments based on purportedly applicable case authority and a non "public purpose" use theory are without merit, and its statutory authority argument is procedurally barred, the circuit court's judgment ruling that the city lacked the authority to impose the tax.
Wells Fargo Bank, NA (order) 04/16/2015 In a suit by homeowners alleging that the defendant lender wrongfully initiated foreclosure on their residence, violating Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations including.F.R 203.604 by failing to conduct a face-to-face meeting with them before initiating.Commonwealth In an appeal raising various issues concerning the Court of Appeals consideration and dismissal of a petition for a writ of actual innocence based on non-biological evidence under Code.2-327.10 through -327.14, involving recantation of evidence provided at a murder trial by a co-defendant.Crewe Factory Sales 10/31/1997 Since voluntary payment of a judgment deprives the payor of the right of appeal, the appeal in this case was improvidently awarded and is dismissed.13(G 2001) of the Rules of Court.Jones (Eric) 01/16/2004 (Revised ) Defendant's convictions for robbery and use of a firearm during that robbery are reinstated, where the evidence showed that defendant used violence and/or intimidation to convert custody of merchandise male whore he had taken into possession in committing a robbery.Commonwealth The Court of Appeals correctly affirmed defendant's conviction for unlawfully discharging a firearm in an occupied dwelling, and being a felon in possession of a firearm, considering challenges under the spousal testimony statute, Code.2-271.2.102398 Smith, Russell.
City of Norfolk (Revised 06/22/2007) In proceedings relating to a referendum petition seeking a repeal of four city ordinances, the circuit court did not err in allowing a city and a redevelopment authority to intervene, but erred in concluding that the petition did not comply.